<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are &#8220;The Rules&#8221; Empowering Women or Demeaning Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/</link>
	<description>Relationship Help, Love Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:46:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trina Colon @ homes foreclosed las vegas</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-10770</link>
		<dc:creator>Trina Colon @ homes foreclosed las vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-10770</guid>
		<description>Yeah I could not agree more with that no rules would keep me in a box or somewhat I&#039;ll do what I want and what I feel to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I could not agree more with that no rules would keep me in a box or somewhat I&#8217;ll do what I want and what I feel to do.<br />
<span class="cluv">Trina Colon @ homes foreclosed las vegas´s last blog ..<a href="http://thepropertylover.com/las-vegas-rehab-heaven/">Las Vegas- Rehab Heaven-</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip -1" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Date Girl</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4640</link>
		<dc:creator>Date Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4640</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never read The Rules, but I can see why they would piss a lot of women off! I agree with Michelle-why can&#039;t we just do what feels right?
At the same time, if you&#039;re a woman who has had failed after failed relationship, it might be time to take a look at what is happening. I know for me, I had to learn not to wear my heart on my sleeve from day one. I was myself, but I stopped throwing myself at men. I gained respect for myself, and let men get to know me. And when the right guy came along, I was able to slowly show him every bit of who I am, and he loves me for it. We didn&#039;t play games, but we didn&#039;t dive head first into things either.
.-= Date Girl´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://dategirldiaries.com/2010/01/20/a-little-update/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Little Update&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never read The Rules, but I can see why they would piss a lot of women off! I agree with Michelle-why can&#8217;t we just do what feels right?<br />
At the same time, if you&#8217;re a woman who has had failed after failed relationship, it might be time to take a look at what is happening. I know for me, I had to learn not to wear my heart on my sleeve from day one. I was myself, but I stopped throwing myself at men. I gained respect for myself, and let men get to know me. And when the right guy came along, I was able to slowly show him every bit of who I am, and he loves me for it. We didn&#8217;t play games, but we didn&#8217;t dive head first into things either.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Date Girl´s last blog ..<a href="http://dategirldiaries.com/2010/01/20/a-little-update/">A Little Update</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4636</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4636</guid>
		<description>Stopping to see how it&#039;s going Tina, hope all is well. I&#039;m sure you&#039;re not missing doing those drops:).
.-= Jude´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://jude8753.com/2010/01/25/hospital-security-for-babies/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hospital Security For Babies&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stopping to see how it&#8217;s going Tina, hope all is well. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re not missing doing those drops:).<br />
<span class="cluv"> Jude´s last blog ..<a href="http://jude8753.com/2010/01/25/hospital-security-for-babies/">Hospital Security For Babies</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy Stahlnecker</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4554</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Stahlnecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4554</guid>
		<description>My daughter says I suffer from the defiance syndrome I think she&#039;s right therefore, I make my own rules...

hugs..

Dorothy from grammology
grammology.com
.-= Dorothy Stahlnecker´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grammology.com/2010/01/21/john-edwards-is-such-a-disappointment/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;John Edwards is such a disappointment&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter says I suffer from the defiance syndrome I think she&#8217;s right therefore, I make my own rules&#8230;</p>
<p>hugs..</p>
<p>Dorothy from grammology<br />
grammology.com<br />
<span class="cluv"> Dorothy Stahlnecker´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.grammology.com/2010/01/21/john-edwards-is-such-a-disappointment/">John Edwards is such a disappointment</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>Rules? I hate rules because it seems all these unwritten and even the written ones are a bunch of poo because who actually follows them? What works for one doesn&#039;t necessarily work for someone else.

On another note I am really sorry to see you are leaving Entrecard, but thanks for the EC&#039;s and I have also added you to my blogroll so I don&#039;t lose track of you.
.-= Jude´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://jude8753.com/2010/01/19/health-insuranceeye-surgerymotorcycles/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Health Insurance/Eye Surgery/Motorcycles&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rules? I hate rules because it seems all these unwritten and even the written ones are a bunch of poo because who actually follows them? What works for one doesn&#8217;t necessarily work for someone else.</p>
<p>On another note I am really sorry to see you are leaving Entrecard, but thanks for the EC&#8217;s and I have also added you to my blogroll so I don&#8217;t lose track of you.<br />
<span class="cluv"> Jude´s last blog ..<a href="http://jude8753.com/2010/01/19/health-insuranceeye-surgerymotorcycles/">Health Insurance/Eye Surgery/Motorcycles</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4541</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4541</guid>
		<description>I should start by saying I have never read The Rules so my opinion is based upon what I have heard.  I think advice for marriage-minded women is fine.  I also think most of the advice in the books sounds helpful (one of the things I liked about my husband was that he called when he said he would). It sounds like people are offended by the idea that relationships should be based upon artifice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should start by saying I have never read The Rules so my opinion is based upon what I have heard.  I think advice for marriage-minded women is fine.  I also think most of the advice in the books sounds helpful (one of the things I liked about my husband was that he called when he said he would). It sounds like people are offended by the idea that relationships should be based upon artifice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Special K</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4518</link>
		<dc:creator>Special K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4518</guid>
		<description>As with all self-help arenas, people SELF select to read those books already jive with the message or they wouldn&#039;t buy them. There&#039;s a market for anxious single women looking for a reason to explain their singleness. Some people need rules. But betcha a million those are NOT the people reading that book! 
All &quot;rules&quot; such as &quot;You should&quot; are meant to provide a structure. Many of them ring true, like &quot;you shouldn&#039;t sleep with some one on the first date if you want a relationship&quot; but like all of life, love can not be ruled. 
Pascal said 
The heart has reasons which reason knows nothing of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with all self-help arenas, people SELF select to read those books already jive with the message or they wouldn&#8217;t buy them. There&#8217;s a market for anxious single women looking for a reason to explain their singleness. Some people need rules. But betcha a million those are NOT the people reading that book!<br />
All &#8220;rules&#8221; such as &#8220;You should&#8221; are meant to provide a structure. Many of them ring true, like &#8220;you shouldn&#8217;t sleep with some one on the first date if you want a relationship&#8221; but like all of life, love can not be ruled.<br />
Pascal said<br />
The heart has reasons which reason knows nothing of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christan</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>Christan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 18:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Christan’s defense of the rules stems from the simple fact that looking at the lives of her happily married friends leads her to conclude that the rules work. &lt;/i&gt;

My defense of &quot;The Rules&quot; stems from believing in the underlying principle of the book. To say my argument was based on the fact that The Rules worked for my friends really over-simplifies the whole point. 

My argument was two fold. One, why not look at the basic principle of The Rules - have a life, know what you want, set appropriate boundaries, value yourself and don&#039;t make a man the center of your world - and try to apply them to your life. Why do so many women try to vilify this book but were over the moon with He&#039;s Just Not That Into You? They&#039;re basically saying the same thing: Stop chasing men who don&#039;t want you. Show some self-respect. Get a life. And above all..STOP LYING TO YOURSELF. It&#039;s ok to want to get married. It doesn&#039;t make you weak or pathetic.

I feel like the people who trash this book focus heavily on the idea that there are &quot;rules&quot; to follow. But these tips are the same ones we&#039;d receive from our friends and give back to them. A guy calls you last minute for a date? You say no. A guy tells you he&#039;ll call you on Tuesday night and doesn&#039;t get around to it until Thursday? You&#039;re not available. And if he really likes you, you can be sure he&#039;s going to step up his game. To me, that&#039;s a lot smarter than having some sit down with him and scolding him about following through on his promises. Now, if it&#039;s a chronic problem then of course you speak up. But then, if it&#039;s a chronic problem.,..why are you with him in the first place?

 think the problem so many women have is with the title and the idea of there being &quot;rules&quot; to &quot;getting&quot; a man and not the themes or advice itself. 

But keep something else in mind...this book is for women who are marriage minded. If that&#039;s not you, then what&#039;s the problem? Is it that this books conveys some message that all women want is to get married?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Christan’s defense of the rules stems from the simple fact that looking at the lives of her happily married friends leads her to conclude that the rules work. </i></p>
<p>My defense of &#8220;The Rules&#8221; stems from believing in the underlying principle of the book. To say my argument was based on the fact that The Rules worked for my friends really over-simplifies the whole point. </p>
<p>My argument was two fold. One, why not look at the basic principle of The Rules &#8211; have a life, know what you want, set appropriate boundaries, value yourself and don&#8217;t make a man the center of your world &#8211; and try to apply them to your life. Why do so many women try to vilify this book but were over the moon with He&#8217;s Just Not That Into You? They&#8217;re basically saying the same thing: Stop chasing men who don&#8217;t want you. Show some self-respect. Get a life. And above all..STOP LYING TO YOURSELF. It&#8217;s ok to want to get married. It doesn&#8217;t make you weak or pathetic.</p>
<p>I feel like the people who trash this book focus heavily on the idea that there are &#8220;rules&#8221; to follow. But these tips are the same ones we&#8217;d receive from our friends and give back to them. A guy calls you last minute for a date? You say no. A guy tells you he&#8217;ll call you on Tuesday night and doesn&#8217;t get around to it until Thursday? You&#8217;re not available. And if he really likes you, you can be sure he&#8217;s going to step up his game. To me, that&#8217;s a lot smarter than having some sit down with him and scolding him about following through on his promises. Now, if it&#8217;s a chronic problem then of course you speak up. But then, if it&#8217;s a chronic problem.,..why are you with him in the first place?</p>
<p> think the problem so many women have is with the title and the idea of there being &#8220;rules&#8221; to &#8220;getting&#8221; a man and not the themes or advice itself. </p>
<p>But keep something else in mind&#8230;this book is for women who are marriage minded. If that&#8217;s not you, then what&#8217;s the problem? Is it that this books conveys some message that all women want is to get married?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandy</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4513</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4513</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if I feel the rules are demeaning to a woman, but I don&#039;t necessarily agree with them. I think that no matter what you need to be who you are, and like you stated at one point if you show to be a more independent woman when in reality you are not, then the man you are dating will eventually see your true self come out and the once independent type woman he fell in love with will no longer be there, which could potentially ruin the relationship.

I am a firm believer in being yourself, although sometimes it&#039;s hard because we naturally seem to be a slightly more positive person when we first meet someone rather than ourselves from day 1. This may not hold true for all but it certainly is true for many.

So I think the rules work for some but not for all, and I don&#039;t think it would catch all woman&#039;s perfect match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if I feel the rules are demeaning to a woman, but I don&#8217;t necessarily agree with them. I think that no matter what you need to be who you are, and like you stated at one point if you show to be a more independent woman when in reality you are not, then the man you are dating will eventually see your true self come out and the once independent type woman he fell in love with will no longer be there, which could potentially ruin the relationship.</p>
<p>I am a firm believer in being yourself, although sometimes it&#8217;s hard because we naturally seem to be a slightly more positive person when we first meet someone rather than ourselves from day 1. This may not hold true for all but it certainly is true for many.</p>
<p>So I think the rules work for some but not for all, and I don&#8217;t think it would catch all woman&#8217;s perfect match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sexy legs and body</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4512</link>
		<dc:creator>sexy legs and body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4512</guid>
		<description>Throw the rule book out the window, no relationship can work by following certain rules. (what if something comes up that is not in the rule book?) Both partners have equal rights, and every relationship should be treated that way.

Colin.
.-= sexy legs and body´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://sexylegsandbody.blogspot.com/2010/01/giveaway-lovely-necklace-by-jeweler-in.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GIVEAWAY: LOVELY  NECKLACE BY JEWELER IN PITTSBURGH.&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throw the rule book out the window, no relationship can work by following certain rules. (what if something comes up that is not in the rule book?) Both partners have equal rights, and every relationship should be treated that way.</p>
<p>Colin.<br />
<span class="cluv"> sexy legs and body´s last blog ..<a href="http://sexylegsandbody.blogspot.com/2010/01/giveaway-lovely-necklace-by-jeweler-in.html">GIVEAWAY: LOVELY  NECKLACE BY JEWELER IN PITTSBURGH.</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One of The Guys</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4509</link>
		<dc:creator>One of The Guys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4509</guid>
		<description>Both people should be involved in the direction of a relationship and how it unfolds. 

Following a set of rules to manipulate how things go is ridiculous. If it works it works. If it doesn&#039;t it doesn&#039;t. 

The biggest mistake people make is choosing the wrong person. Start there and end there, but don&#039;t follow rules to try and fit a square peg in a round hole. The relationship will fall apart sooner or later. 

Guys aren&#039;t that predictable. From my experience, if a guy likes a woman, he doesn&#039;t play games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both people should be involved in the direction of a relationship and how it unfolds. </p>
<p>Following a set of rules to manipulate how things go is ridiculous. If it works it works. If it doesn&#8217;t it doesn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>The biggest mistake people make is choosing the wrong person. Start there and end there, but don&#8217;t follow rules to try and fit a square peg in a round hole. The relationship will fall apart sooner or later. </p>
<p>Guys aren&#8217;t that predictable. From my experience, if a guy likes a woman, he doesn&#8217;t play games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: askcherlock</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator>askcherlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4501</guid>
		<description>When it comes to romance, structure should go out the window. Spontaneity is so much better. These rules somehow seem too much like chess. And if the relationship should advance to marriage, who wants to constantly anticipate the next move? It just seems unnatural to me.
.-= askcherlock´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.askcherlock.com/?p=1818&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Turmoil of Finding Inner Peace&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to romance, structure should go out the window. Spontaneity is so much better. These rules somehow seem too much like chess. And if the relationship should advance to marriage, who wants to constantly anticipate the next move? It just seems unnatural to me.<br />
<span class="cluv"> askcherlock´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.askcherlock.com/?p=1818">The Turmoil of Finding Inner Peace</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singlutionary</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>singlutionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>I think the problem with the rules is that they lay out a system to &quot;catch&quot; a man. The advice isn&#039;t bad but it doesn&#039;t get at the underlying concept.

For example. I agree that it is better to not see someone more than 3 times a week. I would say this is good for both genders. Absence makes the heart grow fonder and you don&#039;t want to be too available. Plus, everyone needs time for themselves.

But to use that as a tactic to make a man &quot;want&quot; you more?

Ugh. I would rather just be so busy enjoying my life that I don&#039;t notice that its been 3 days since I last saw my fellow.

The most important thing is to not sit around waiting for the phone to ring. So if he is late calling you, well, you&#039;ve already got plans -- you don&#039;t have to lie about it!

Actions ALWAYS speak louder than words. If you&#039;re a hot commodity, you&#039;re out in the world doing your thing and not waiting around to be some fellow&#039;s bitch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the problem with the rules is that they lay out a system to &#8220;catch&#8221; a man. The advice isn&#8217;t bad but it doesn&#8217;t get at the underlying concept.</p>
<p>For example. I agree that it is better to not see someone more than 3 times a week. I would say this is good for both genders. Absence makes the heart grow fonder and you don&#8217;t want to be too available. Plus, everyone needs time for themselves.</p>
<p>But to use that as a tactic to make a man &#8220;want&#8221; you more?</p>
<p>Ugh. I would rather just be so busy enjoying my life that I don&#8217;t notice that its been 3 days since I last saw my fellow.</p>
<p>The most important thing is to not sit around waiting for the phone to ring. So if he is late calling you, well, you&#8217;ve already got plans &#8212; you don&#8217;t have to lie about it!</p>
<p>Actions ALWAYS speak louder than words. If you&#8217;re a hot commodity, you&#8217;re out in the world doing your thing and not waiting around to be some fellow&#8217;s bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BK</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4497</link>
		<dc:creator>BK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4497</guid>
		<description>The rules are neutral to me or rather I didn&#039;t even know someone wrote such rules for women. I have often heard the need for women to hold their horses and not take too much initiative but I guess I don&#039;t really support such a rule. Perhaps, my thinkings are more radical, I believe in being oneself, whether one is a woman or man. If the other person doesn&#039;t like it, it is the other person&#039;s problem. I will very much like to focus on a person&#039;s characters.
.-= BK´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.symphonyoflove.net/blog/1419/achieving-greatness-is-for-you-and-i.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Achieving Greatness is for You and I&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules are neutral to me or rather I didn&#8217;t even know someone wrote such rules for women. I have often heard the need for women to hold their horses and not take too much initiative but I guess I don&#8217;t really support such a rule. Perhaps, my thinkings are more radical, I believe in being oneself, whether one is a woman or man. If the other person doesn&#8217;t like it, it is the other person&#8217;s problem. I will very much like to focus on a person&#8217;s characters.<br />
<span class="cluv"> BK´s last blog ..<a href="http://www.symphonyoflove.net/blog/1419/achieving-greatness-is-for-you-and-i.html">Achieving Greatness is for You and I</a> <span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://luvemorleavem.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/2010/01/19/are-the-rules-empowering-women-or-demeaning-them/comment-page-1/#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.luvemorleavem.com/blog/?p=827#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>The rules don&#039;t offend me, demean me, or empower me at all. 

I just think they are stupid. Why are their rules? Why can&#039;t we just do what feels right in our hearts? that&#039;s what I do. To me it just seems easier to go with your gut then follow some rule book somebody wrote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rules don&#8217;t offend me, demean me, or empower me at all. </p>
<p>I just think they are stupid. Why are their rules? Why can&#8217;t we just do what feels right in our hearts? that&#8217;s what I do. To me it just seems easier to go with your gut then follow some rule book somebody wrote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
